Final reflection:
After
gaining feedback to my blog posts from the members in my group to reflect and
respond to here is what I have found; From Natalia’s feedback for my pirate
ship experience, she has sparked ideas about other aspects I can include during
our study about pirates. For example provide a computer to print out photos of different
pirate ships, share you tube clips and play pirate songs, these will inspire
the children’s ‘innovative and imaginative designs.’ Although we do not yet have
access to a computer I can adopt these ideas by having printed out the pictures
at home then bring them into the centre, use my I-phone to access you tube and
down load pirate songs together off I tunes onto my I-phone. From these
activities that will build on the foundations of knowledge they already have in
regards to both the topic of pirates and also digital technology. This can
relate to “… to develop
a broad technological literacy that will equip them to practice in society as
informed citizens and give them access to technology related careers” (Ministry
of Education, 2007, p.32).In regards to Katy’s comment, I really like the idea
of producing a scrapbook to capture the processes
the children have gone through to create the end product as I believe that the process
is definitely more important than the product, as highlighted by Smorti (1999) “using
a process approach to technology (similar to our current approach to the
creative arts in early childhood), it is the ‘doing’ that is important, rather
than the ‘product’(p.6). I would like to contribute to the scrap book by
capturing photos and language transcripts (Arthur, Beecher, Death, Dockett
& Farmer, 2008) during the process. I can also provide cameras for the
children to use to document their own and their peers hard work, learning and
development of new knowledge. As told by Arthur,
Beecher, Death, Dockett & Farmer (2008) photographs can be particularly useful for
capturing children's engagement in experiences, group processes, the stages of
children's creations and constructions and group projects" (p.297). This ensures
we are laying the foundations for the children and their future, in regards to
technology (Ministry of education, 2007).
In
response to feedback from my peers for my leap-pad blog post, I have come to
realise that I did not explain my point of view clear enough, Natalia stated
that although she believed that digital devices can be used educationally, she
believed that the physical act of ‘doing’ and creating is important cognitive
processes in early childhood development, such as; holding a pencil. I agree
with her statement, however after researching what technology really is over
the past weeks, isn’t technology a form of ‘doing? I now believe digital
technology has a time and a place and if use correctly, and if children are
guided in the right direction technology can be an enriching education tool. It
also is going to be part of essential knowledge for the future generation, due
to the rapidly changing world. “There have been major social, economic and
technological changes in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries in
many parts of the world, resulting in changing experiences of childhoods” (Arthur,
Beecher, Death, Dockett, & Farmer, 2008, p.12). Katy pointed out the value of Ako, reciprocal
teaching and learning, which made me reflect back on how important and
empowering this is, which during this experience really highlighted my personal
teaching philosophy, “empowerment
enables children to develop a sense of self-worth, identity, confidence and
enjoyment” (Ministry of education, 1996, p.40). In regards
to technology I believe that for myself, these shared teaching and learning experiences
will become more apparent because some of the children actually have
accumulated more knowledge about the use of digital technological devices. This
may be because in today’s technological age “most children experience a range
of technologies as a part of everyday life” (Arthur, Beecher, Death, Dockett
& Farmer, 2007, p. 12) and like Tsantis, Bewick and Thorntant (2003) state I fall in to the teacher’s
category of a concerned teacher who doubts their ability to use computers
effectively (p.2). Jody’s comment was reassuring, as it acknowledged that there
was another person out there that felt the same way as I do, in regards to technology
hindering physical activity. But like me, after studying technology over the
past weeks has come to realise that technology does have a time and place as it
is use to “help people and solve problems” (Smorti,
1999, p.5). After reflecting on Natalia’s
comment, I did not realise that although I am a strong advocate for outdoor
play and physical activity I am still able to integrate technology into my
teaching practice. She pointed out that I was adaptable, yet true to myself, which
I had never looked into this myself, so was very refreshing to hear it from
someone else. I believe that this shows that I beginning to move in a positive
direction forward in favour to technology, with this rapidly changing society
we live it (Arthur, et al, 2008).
From
this assignment my overall perspective has changed. Smorti (1999) has taught me
that technology is everywhere “helping people solve problems” (p.5). It is not just
limited to digital devices. Although I am still a fixed advocate for outdoor
play and physical activity, my point of view has shifted, I now realise that technology
plays an important role for the future generations, and in the access to communication
(Santrock, 2011). I now believe that technology has a time and place in early
childhood “statistics indicate that computers and the Internet are
part of many children’s social worlds, meaning that many children have access
to a range of information and texts, including texts of popular culture” (Arthur,
Beecher, Death, Dockett & Farmer, 2008, p. 13) and can have a positive
impact on children’s learning if used correctly and in a safe manner, like in
the experiences I shared in my blog posts.
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2008). Programming and planning in early childhood settings (4th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.
Ministry of Education. (1996). Te whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō nga mokopuna o Aotearoa/ Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington,
New Zealand: Learning Media.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-span development (13th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill
Smorti, S. (1999) Technology in Early Childhood. Early Education, 19, 5-10.
Tsantis, L., Bewick, C., & Thornton,
S. (2003). Examining some common myths about computers in the early years. Young Children on the Web, November
2003, 1-9.

